<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Nokia Blog - Latest Comments in Nokia N82 Using Sportstracker At 10000 Meters Altitude</title><link>http://thenokiablog.disqus.com/</link><description>News, Reviews, Guides, Videos for Nokia Fanatics</description><atom:link href="https://thenokiablog.disqus.com/nokia_n82_using_sportstracker_at_10000_meters_altitude/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:01:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Nokia N82 Using Sportstracker At 10000 Meters Altitude</title><link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/06/13/nokia-n82-using-sportstracker-at-10000-meters-altitude/#comment-7436292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article Al.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike M</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:01:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia N82 Using Sportstracker At 10000 Meters Altitude</title><link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/06/13/nokia-n82-using-sportstracker-at-10000-meters-altitude/#comment-7436291</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, as long as they don't realize what you're doing, nobody cares anyway. And if they do, I don't mind to discuss - usually they give it up after a short discussion. Over here, you can only be jailed if you committed a crime, not if you just don't play by the civil rules of a civil company ...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">onlife</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:05:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia N82 Using Sportstracker At 10000 Meters Altitude</title><link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/06/13/nokia-n82-using-sportstracker-at-10000-meters-altitude/#comment-7436290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@onlife&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd have loved to keep it on the entire trip.  Wrong or not, the fear of being fined or jailed makes me behave and obey.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Al Pavangkanan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:44:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia N82 Using Sportstracker At 10000 Meters Altitude</title><link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/06/13/nokia-n82-using-sportstracker-at-10000-meters-altitude/#comment-7436289</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@onlife: I believe one of the reasons for this is safety. Takeoff and landing is the part of a flight with the biggest risk of bad stuff happening, and you don't want 200 passengers with their iPods plugged in when you try to tell them to duck and grab their ankles.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Mc Nally</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:30:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia N82 Using Sportstracker At 10000 Meters Altitude</title><link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/06/13/nokia-n82-using-sportstracker-at-10000-meters-altitude/#comment-7436288</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Radio receivers also emit, or "leak", radio frequencies.  So your GPS chip was likely emitting a - very low - signal.  Since the frequency depends on the receiver architecture, there's no way to conclusively know that *all* receivers are safe to use in aircraft.  That's the reason for the blanket prohibition of transmitters *and* receivers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As to the EU regulation, if I remember correctly it is only supposed to be used with microcells installed on the plane which signal the mobile to transmit at its lowest setting.  Plus, the frequencies are known/tested with the relevant avionics before they are allowed to be used on board.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, Al, technically speaking, the Feds might want to have a word with you (not that I'd expect that to happen).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dimitris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:48:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia N82 Using Sportstracker At 10000 Meters Altitude</title><link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/06/13/nokia-n82-using-sportstracker-at-10000-meters-altitude/#comment-7436287</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You seriously turned it off when the pilot said to turn off all electronic devices? Oh, you Americans are such slaves to authorities, even when they're wrong ... Over here in Europe, nobody cares for what the crew says about electronic devices. We just use them, 'cause we know it don't bother the plane. For example, what should a GPS-receiving device with flight mode on ever harm? Even the plane you were sitting in receives GPS signals, so what?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The European Union recently even cleared the way for normal mobile phone usage in planes, e.g. data and calls. If you want to see a lot of flights on sportstracker, set the workout type to flying and search for everybody, you'll find a whole lot of people doing this from start to landing :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">onlife</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:18:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nokia N82 Using Sportstracker At 10000 Meters Altitude</title><link>http://thenokiablog.com/2008/06/13/nokia-n82-using-sportstracker-at-10000-meters-altitude/#comment-7436286</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tried the same thing with my N82 during the flight from Madrid to NY. It seemed that whenever the plane changes altitude the connection gets lost and that the best thing about it is taking pictures and geotagging them, also it's nice to see the planes speed and aprroximate time till destination on your N82 (assumming you geotagged JFK's location.&lt;br&gt;Here is one example of my geotagged in-flight picture: &lt;a href="http://pt-br.zooomr.com/photos/a1745/4660142/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://pt-br.zooomr.com/photos/a1745/4660142/"&gt;http://pt-br.zooomr.com/pho...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:33:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>